Simplicity: (not really sure if I got that bacon and eggs metaphor Sean... but I'ma let you rock with that one : p )
Seeing as that I do not have a child, I'm not sure with how much validity I can speak. However,
I am aware of one too many situations where dramatic lifestyles are being lived out with regard to babies and parents.
Not being a mom, ladies, I can't quite argue for us keeping the kid especially as Sean makes a very good point:
If the man is willing to provide and support his son, he is the best person to raise him into a true, "man."
The same goes for women, a girl raised in the environment of a man without any female mother figures will view life from a different perspective than one raised by a woman.
Granted, I can't sit here and say that these two circumstances are inevitably tragic, because it's been done before but the bond between a mother and daughter and that between a man and woman is one that can not be replaced or regenerated with anyone else. I think it's a shame that we fall victim to the struggles of custody because if those in relationships could simply calm down and realize... this can be done. we both can be the parents of our children and make the compromise to willingly let the rightful person have the child the world would be a much more civilized place. However, this is not our dreams come true and reality is, many women do feel that carrying a child for 9 months warrants them all rights and custody to him or her.
Sean, you can't imagine the feelings that arise inside of a woman even when she simply suspects she's pregnant and doesn't know if she is or she isn't. But, at the same time the two of you felt a certain way about each other at a certain time which created this beautiful child so that same love and care that nurtured the baby thus far should be a great factor in the decision. It should not be a matter of arguing and who can provide the most supporting evidence for who is entitled to the child because frankly, you're right. It is a 50/50 process in terms of conception and those women who don't understand that it's a great thing to have a man wanting to own up to and care for his son are the one's that you should have avoided in the first place, because ultimately she never understood you to begin with!
While this is a scenario no one in a relationship looks forward to or plans for it is something that in this day and age should be looked at and addressed prior to any long term commitments even if its in a hypothetical sense, this way both men and women will know what possibilities exist.
I support the ratified "mandate" and agree that it should not be a fight or struggle and that this understanding should be enforced earlier than later.
P.s. just because the baby lives with one parent or another, does not mean the one he or she is not with falls absent to their upbringing, it just means he or she will be raised in one respect compared to another.
Seeing as that I do not have a child, I'm not sure with how much validity I can speak. However,
I am aware of one too many situations where dramatic lifestyles are being lived out with regard to babies and parents.
Not being a mom, ladies, I can't quite argue for us keeping the kid especially as Sean makes a very good point:
If the man is willing to provide and support his son, he is the best person to raise him into a true, "man."
The same goes for women, a girl raised in the environment of a man without any female mother figures will view life from a different perspective than one raised by a woman.
Granted, I can't sit here and say that these two circumstances are inevitably tragic, because it's been done before but the bond between a mother and daughter and that between a man and woman is one that can not be replaced or regenerated with anyone else. I think it's a shame that we fall victim to the struggles of custody because if those in relationships could simply calm down and realize... this can be done. we both can be the parents of our children and make the compromise to willingly let the rightful person have the child the world would be a much more civilized place. However, this is not our dreams come true and reality is, many women do feel that carrying a child for 9 months warrants them all rights and custody to him or her.
Sean, you can't imagine the feelings that arise inside of a woman even when she simply suspects she's pregnant and doesn't know if she is or she isn't. But, at the same time the two of you felt a certain way about each other at a certain time which created this beautiful child so that same love and care that nurtured the baby thus far should be a great factor in the decision. It should not be a matter of arguing and who can provide the most supporting evidence for who is entitled to the child because frankly, you're right. It is a 50/50 process in terms of conception and those women who don't understand that it's a great thing to have a man wanting to own up to and care for his son are the one's that you should have avoided in the first place, because ultimately she never understood you to begin with!
While this is a scenario no one in a relationship looks forward to or plans for it is something that in this day and age should be looked at and addressed prior to any long term commitments even if its in a hypothetical sense, this way both men and women will know what possibilities exist.
I support the ratified "mandate" and agree that it should not be a fight or struggle and that this understanding should be enforced earlier than later.
P.s. just because the baby lives with one parent or another, does not mean the one he or she is not with falls absent to their upbringing, it just means he or she will be raised in one respect compared to another.
No comments:
Post a Comment